Why is it that a person in one city can wake up late, stroll to a nearby coffee shop, and savour a leisurely start to the day, while another in a neighbouring city wakes at dawn, battling traffic just for a lukewarm cup of instant coffee at work? The answer stretches far beyond a simple "why." It delves into the realm of urban design – how the built environment shapes our choices, even seemingly mundane ones like our morning routines.
This exploration bypasses the complexities of free will vs. determinism. However, it acknowledges that our "free" choices often operate within a framework shaped by external influences, including the design of our cities. We don't choose our childhood environments, and even when we choose where to live and work, we don't get to dictate road designs, building density, or bicycle lanes. We can migrate or change jobs, but even then, we enter a new web of urban (or rural) influences.
Let's explore two contrasting cities, Draba and Prana, through the mornings of two fictional residents, Mr. Shonebare and Mr. Tomide. While acknowledging their individual choices, we'll highlight how urban design shapes their experiences.
<br><br>
<h5><b>Morning 1: The Rush Hour Symphony of Draba</b></h5>
It's 4:00 am in the sprawling outskirts of Draba, a city of concrete and sand. Mr. Shonebare, a man built for comfort more than speed, stirs awake. As on every weekday, he beats his alarm and dresses quickly, hoping not to disturb his wife. By 5:00 am, he's on the road in his Jeep, navigating the pre-dawn darkness. He speeds past the few figures trudging to the bus stop, a fleeting moment of smugness crossing his face as he hits the highway – no traffic yet. He arrives at work early, the third person through the door at 6:00 am. He settles into his seat and switches on the electric kettle for coffee. Before the water boils, sleep overtakes him. He awakens with a jolt 35 minutes later, heavy-eyed and burdened by fatigue. He sips his poorly made coffee, staring at the city awakening through the glass walls of his corner office on the 9th floor. "Thank you, God, for today," he murmurs, collapsing back into his chair at 7:00 am.
<br><br>
<h5><b>Morning 2: The Gentle Serenade of Prana</b></h5>
Meanwhile, across the continent in the heart of Prana, the time is 7:21 am. Outside a brick and timber house on the edge of a quiet cul-de-sac, Mr Tomide finally emerges from bed. The aroma of freshly made pancakes, courtesy of his girlfriend Katherine, proves more effective than the alarm or the morning light filtering through the blinds. A leisurely 20 minutes later, he's out the door with a half-eaten pancake in one hand and a briefcase in the other. He greets his neighbour Tommy with a smile as he heads to his bicycle, and arrives at his local coffee shop by 8:14 am. "My usual, please," he says, reaching for his card. "Here you go, Mr. Tomide," replies the barista, Sharon, with a smile. "Thank you, Sharon. See you tomorrow," he replies before heading to work. He stumbles into his office seat at 8:50 am, exchanging greetings and completing his daily check-in. By 9:00 am, he finishes his coffee with a satisfied sigh, a sense of accomplishment washing over him for having navigated a smooth morning routine.
<br><br>
<h5><b>The Architect's Invisible Hand</b></h5>
Let's assume both men work similar corporate hours and have comparable social-economic backgrounds. Now, let's examine how the design of their respective cities shapes their experiences.
Draba is a car-dependent city. Wide, abundant roads prioritize automobiles. Walking is impractical; affordable housing sprawls far from the central business district. Sidewalks are patchy, and disrupted by car access points. Buses, though available, get caught in traffic, offering little advantage. This design practically forces car ownership. Mr. Shonebare's 4:00 am wake-up call isn't a personal choice; it's a consequence of Draba's car-centric layout. Waking up later would mean battling rush hour traffic, a Hobson's choice at best. There's no time for a coffee shop stop – they might not be open at his ungodly hour. Even if there were a nearby shop, his constant rush blinds him to his surroundings. His free will isn't eliminated, but certain options become more practical within the framework of his city.
In contrast, Prana is a walkable city. While the central business district isn't necessarily within walking distance for everyone, bicycles and well-maintained walkways offer convenient alternatives. Mr. Tomide's leisurely wake-up reflects this design. Since his city prioritizes pedestrians and cyclists, he can choose a more relaxed pace. He has time for breakfast with his partner, a friendly exchange with a neighbour, and a familiar coffee stop. His life unfolds at a less frenetic pace, allowing him to savour his surroundings and potentially work more efficiently. Ironically, Mr. Shonebare might not realize how much better his morning could be, just as Mr. Tomide might not grasp the luxury of his daily routine.
<br><br>
<h5><b>Beyond Choices: A Call to Design</b></h5>
Both men make choices, reflecting a compatibilist view of free will and determinism. Our "free" choices operate within a world that shapes and influences them. This underscores the importance of thoughtful urban design. Decisions about city plans and architecture aren't just about aesthetics; they impact the daily lives of residents. They create a web of influences, some with far-reaching consequences. Here, we've focused on how urban design can influence something as seemingly mundane as a morning routine, even affecting how sweet a cup of coffee tastes.
<br><br>
<h5><b>A Look to the Future</b></h5>
Moving forward, urban planners and architects can play a crucial role in shaping more empowering environments. Prioritizing walkable neighbourhoods, public transportation networks, and green spaces can empower residents to create their own "morning ragas," daily symphonies composed of choices that lead to a more fulfilling life. Imagine a world where Mr. Shonebare doesn't have to wake up at the crack of dawn, battling traffic just for a lukewarm cup of coffee. Imagine a world where Mr. Tomide's experience and the choices afforded his will are the norm, not the exception. The power to create such a world lies partly in the hands of those who design our cities.
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments