<p>What comes to mind when you hear "the poor masses"? </p><p>A picture of deprivation, struggle, and empty pockets, perhaps? </p><p>But what if I told you that this narrative isn't the whole truth? </p><p>That "the poor masses" in Nigeria are, in fact, a complex paradox, a tool for governments, a goldmine for businesses, and sometimes a weapon turned against their loved ones. Intrigued? Stay with me as we peel back the layers of a story that's equal parts thought-provoking and downright hilarious.</p><p>Let’s start with the government’s love-hate relationship with the so-called poor. In every campaign season, the masses are the backbone of electoral success, herded into long lines with promises of rice, oil, and "change" that often remain elusive. Yet, beyond the ballot box, they are wielded as proof of underdevelopment, for securing international loans and grants hence the growing population of NGOs(now more or less a business but that's a topic on its own). But here's the kicker: those same "poor masses" somehow manage to sustain local economies with their relentless buying power, no matter how small it seems. They're not just surviving, they're the foundation on which businesses thrive. The roadside hawker selling puff-puff? Likely clearing more profit margins than some white-collar workers.</p><p>Now let’s shift focus to the streets of Lagos, where the ubiquitous “beggar economy” thrives. Ever stopped at a traffic light and handed out a few naira to a needy-looking beggar? Multiply that act by thousands of unsuspecting motorists, and you’ll realize that some of these street beggars coordinated like a well-oiled machine, earn more in a day than many office workers do in a month. Or the village uncle who's perpetually “broke,” yet somehow always shows up with a new agbada at family functions? These individuals are masters of leveraging emotional currency. They collect from every family member with claims of urgent needs but have a way of showing up in unexpected affluence, leaving you wondering if the real hustler is you.
</p><p>And here's where it gets darker. These "poor masses" are often unwitting weapons. The hardworking aunt who sacrifices to send money to her village? Her resources might just be used to fuel jealousy rather than gratitude, becoming ammunition in endless family feuds. The cousin who constantly borrows without repaying? A walking liability, draining every ounce of goodwill until nothing is left but regret.
</p><p>So, what's the takeaway? </p><p>It’s time to rethink statements like "I’m helping the less privileged.” Many of the so-called poor aren't truly poor, they're just better at tapping into other people’s resources. We must clarify our narratives and redefine generosity. After all, sustaining someone who refuses to sustain themselves isn’t kindness, it’s enabling and encouraging laziness at its peak. And let’s admit, sometimes the joke is on us.
</p><p>What do you think?</p><p>Like I said I'm not a talker, only a curious writer.</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments