Like many tech bros out there, working for Udacity has been one of my major objectives. When I aced the Udacity Interview, many of my friends reached out to me for tips and guidance for their upcoming job hunting and interview in any of the big EdTech (i.e., Coursera, Udemy and Udacity).
During these conversations, I began to notice patterns and thought it might be worthwhile to document my experience since I am well aware of the challenges of interviewing in and out. It is a bittersweet process that can put your imposter syndrome to the test, especially if you believe you need to be a superhuman in your tech stack to get into one of the big EdTech companies. Many online resources aided my preparation, and this is one way for me to give back to the tech community.
Fun fact: I received my first interview invitation from Udacity in 2019 but did not take the first test due to imposter syndrome. I was unmotivated to take the test, so I declined the invitation because I was not prepared to embark on a journey in which I assumed I had to be a superhuman to excel. My biggest regret in my tech career was declining; I could have made a lot of money by now to give baby "K" her dream wedding, lol.
In the words of Eloise Ristad, “When we give ourselves permission to fail, we, at the same time, give ourselves permission to excel”. I failed at permitting myself to test failure.
During my five-year career as a software and machine learning engineer, I've worked at a fintech company, start-ups and on massive Federal and State Government projects. I was also a master's student at Covenant University during this time, with a research focus on Natural Language Processing for improving Long-Text grading in Educational Technology. Each experience taught me a lot, and I believe that the knowledge I gained at each stage made my transition into Udacity easier than it would have been for techies without data structure/algorithm, web technologies and machine learning research experience.
Motivation
When I decided to look for my next opportunity, I had one objective: I wanted to take my time preparing for my next big role and not settle for anything less. Although I was interviewing for some of the big giants in the EdTech industry at the time, my chances of getting into Udacity were slim, as it was known to be one of the toughest machine learning and software engineering interviews in the industry. But somewhere in my mind, I knew I had to try because getting into the world's biggest tech company was not impossible. I would never have known unless I tried, kind of like Robert F. Kennedy, only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly.
Studying based on Udacity's Nanodegree Curriculum and preparing specifically for it is generally the most overlooked section by candidates, and all I can say is that it is one of those sections that will certainly set you apart from others.
Hacking the patterns and elements of an Interview
Interview preparation, in my opinion, entails mastering four critical skills. Coding/technical, design patterns, resumes/previous projects, and, finally, organisational culture are all important considerations.
Coding and Technical
In my career, every company I have interviewed for has had at least two rounds of data structure and algorithm questions, as well as one round of technical questions in which you are given a problem and must come up with a solution and code for it. In most cases, you will also be expected to understand the fundamentals of the programming language for that role. Udacity will put your basic understanding of Python programming, SQL queries, containerisation, continuous integration, and continuous deployment to the test. Don't overlook your fundamental software engineering knowledge.
E.g., “Explain the components in Docker Image?”
The majority of the coding and technical questions on Udacity were problems and exercises from the Udacity Nanodegree program (i.e., full-stack web development, SQL, PostgreSQL machine learning, data science, and data structure and algorithms).
Design Patterns
Depending on the role I was interviewing for, some companies have one round of design pattern where you are given a rather abstract framework, and you are required to come up with a concept (i.e, architectural framework) for that system.
E.g., “How would you design a system if you had to build a classification model from scratch to detect cancer from a given imbalanced cancer dataset?”
Resume/Previous Projects
This is one of those interview rounds where I worked hard to showcase some of the amazing projects I have worked on while sharing my research experience. There is more to interviewing than just coding. It all comes down to establishing yourself as a potential teammate. This requires you to demonstrate to the recruiters how you have previously collaborated on projects with others. This section on your resume could be about something specific, such as a skill or a project.
E.g., "Could you please tell me about the blocker you faced in this project and how you overcame them?"
Organisational Culture
Understanding Udacity’s mission, vision and core values and preparing for it is generally the most overlooked section by candidates and is one of those sections that will set you apart from other candidates. You could or might not be asked direct questions about it, but this will help you prepare much better for the sections above.
E.g., “How can your technical skills enhance our core values?”
In the next part, I will discuss the resources and strategy I utilised to scale through the Udacity Interview. Watch out for part two!!
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments