<p><strong><em>I’ll show you how we got from Ada Lovelace’s steam‑powered dreams to Copilot cranking out 25 percent of new code, why today’s AI “vibe coding” tutorials leave you hollow, and how to crush the learning curve by forging muscle memory through real projects with AI as your sidekick. We’ll uncover why documentation is the backbone of every maintainable codebase, why JavaScript remains the most forgiving first language, and how building a browser‑based chess game is the ultimate initiation for any newbie.</em></strong></p><p><em><br></em></p><p><strong><em>Lets go back to the basics </em></strong></p><p><br></p><p>Ada Lovelace, in 1843, annotated Babbage’s Analytical Engine with the first published algorithm—proof that programming predates silicon by a century. </p><p>Some 100 years later Grace Hoper unleashed the A‑0 system, the very precursor to modern compilers, translating human‑friendly symbols into machine instructions on the UNIVAC. </p><p><strong><em>Matters arising </em></strong></p><p>We live in a world where GitHub Copilot claims responsibility for a quarter of new code commits. Yet Cloudflare’s Matthew Prince warns that “no code will ever be released without significant human review,” insisting AI augments but doesn’t replace human insight. Uber’s Dara Khosrowshahi goes further, declaring AI literacy “an absolute necessity” for every employee within a year.</p><p><br></p><p>These pronouncements mask a darker truth: most “tutorials” today spoon‑feed snippets without forcing you to think, decide, or debug. The result? Newbies who can conjure code from prompts but crumble at the first 404 or logic bug.</p><p><br></p><p><strong><em>Project‑First, AI‑Augmented Learning Wins</em></strong></p><p>Primeagen—streaming on Twitch and Reddit—is blunt: “The syntax isn’t the hurdle. It’s making decisions”. His sessions are pure friction: build from scratch, break on purpose, and debug in real time. AI tools like Copilot can scaffold boilerplate, but you must rip it apart, rebuild it, and wrestle with every semicolon to internalize the patterns.</p><p><br></p><p>This is how muscle memory forms: your fingers learn the keystrokes, your brain learns the decisions. Every failed build teaches you more than a thousand “hello world” tutorials ever could.</p><p><strong><em>Documentation: The Unsung Hero</em></strong></p><p><br></p><p>Software documentation isn’t optional fluff—it’s the blueprint keeping teams coherent and codebases alive. Skip the docs, and you incur technical debt that compounds like interest. From COBOL manuals to modern Swagger specs, documentation has always bridged complexity and clarity—without it, even the best code becomes incomprehensible.</p><p><em><br></em></p><p><strong><em>JavaScript: The 10‑Day Wonder & Perfect Starter</em></strong></p><p><br></p><p>In May 1995, Brendan Eich whipped up Mocha (soon renamed LiveScript, then JavaScript) in just ten days to inject dynamism into Netscape Navigator. By 1997, ECMAScript standardized its quirks, and today JS’s forgiving syntax, instant in‑browser feedback, and gargantuan ecosystem make it unrivaled for beginners.</p><p><br></p><p>Non‑coders can grok variables as digital Post‑its, functions as mini‑recipes, and arrays as lists they’d recognize from a grocery run. Error messages appear in the console like chat replies, nudging you toward solutions without the baggage of compilers or linkers.</p><p><em><br></em></p><p><strong><em>Your First Quest</em></strong></p><p><br></p><p>No tutorial can replace the depth of a chess‑game project. You’ll wrestle with:</p><p><br></p><p>- State management: Tracking piece positions, turn order, and valid moves </p><p>- Object modeling: Representing pawns, knights, and kings as interactive entities </p><p>- Event handlin*: Drag‑and‑drop interfaces and click‑to‑select mechanics </p><p>- Basic AI: Writing a simple minimax engine or heuristic evaluator to suggest moves </p><p><br></p><p>Start small: render a grid, place a pawn, log valid moves. Expand to full rules, check detection, castling, and en passant. By the time your rook hits the edge, you’ll own the syntax, control flow, and debugging mastery needed for any real‑world codebase.</p><p><strong><em>The Hacker’s Charge: Code Like It’s 3 AM</em></strong></p><p>No more passive watching. No more shortcut slideshows. At 3 AM, you either ship or you sleep. Break something, fix it, document it, repeat. Build that chess game. Then refactor it. Then ask Copilot for a second opinion. Then build the next project.</p><p>Because in 2025, the true edge isn’t AI— it’s the coder who wields it with muscle‑memory mastery and a rock‑solid understanding of what happens under the hood. Code drunk, blog sober—and watch the tips roll in.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments