<p>If you are a filmmaker, I bet you would have heard the phrase 'give the audience what they want' on multiple occasions. It can be frustrating, especially in the Nollywood scene where producers/directors lord their superiority over writers and are dead set on their beliefs over what the audience wants.</p><p><br></p><p>And while it's true that movie goers have certain tropes which they seem to have become accustomed to, I do not agree that creatives have to follow those tropes at all times - personally, I feel it's lazy and limiting filmmaking. One of the many beauties of filmmaking is experiencing diverse point of views of a particular ideology or completely different ideologies altogether. Therefore, I think it's sinful to deprive thousands, maybe even millions of people these experiences by churning out slightly altered versions of the same movie.</p><p><br></p><p>I recall once at a seminar, a popular producer boldly told us : ' if you are not producing comedies or glam movies, then forget about it'. This singular experience was one of the most depressing of my journey in filmmaking. While I appreciate well done comedies, I am not drawn to writing them (at least not yet) and I am definitely not big on the idea of using glam to cover up shoddy plot, acting or production. So did this mean that I had no future in the film industry?</p><p><br></p><p>Thankfully it didn't as there are people who appreciate my work for what it is. Plus my foray into ghostwriting has afforded me the opportunity to flex my creative muscle in various genres and creative media.</p><p><br></p><p>I can hear someone murmur 'Hollywood does this too'. Yes, they do, but they also have a long list of evidence that they also take risk by birthing new ideas (Star wars, Avatar, Black Mirror, and these are just a few). But somehow we only draw inferences with the shortcomings of Hollywood and never their hunger to break new grounds. Hollywood isn't as obsessed as Nollywood is with 'giving the audience what they want'. </p><p><br></p><p>The big question now is what does the audience want? Is it a watered down theme or on the nose and preachy dialogue so they get the message? Or the needless infusion of cringe comedy so they can laugh and have a good time? Perhaps it might be the cheesy and poorly executed love dynamic between a man and woman (looking at you YouTube movies). On careful consideration, we find that giving the audience what they want is vague. Like I said earlier it's just an excuse to churn out mediocre works intended as cash grabs. Again, YouTube Nollywood, I see you.</p><p><br></p><p>This write up would piss off a lot of Nigerian filmmakers if they see it, and I hope they do. But I'm not sorry. We've swam in the ocean of mediocrity for so long, the permanent stench of the water lingers on us. I was not drawn to filmmaking from childhood to get lost in the sea of mediocrity, I know what wonders films can do. I know the undiscovered emotions a good movie can evoke within a person, and I know first hand how well crafted and carefully thought stories can inspire.</p><p><br></p><p>Moreover, the audience is due for something new. A couple of months ago, a teaser to the upcoming movie 'Finding Messiah' sent social media agog. It wasn't the regular stuff that the audience was used to, but the hype that has been built around it is mind-blowing. You cannot assume that a child would only eat beans and nothing else, when all you serve him is beans.</p><p><br></p><p>It's common knowledge that a lot of people don't watch Nollywood movies in the cinemas. It is not because they are unpatriotic to their own stuff, it's because their excitement hasn't been aroused - a lot of them do not see the need to see something that has been done a thousand times. Create something good and exciting, create something fresh and watch how these same people wholeheartedly pay to see it.</p><p><br></p><p>I absolutely believe there's a lot Nollywood can achieve if we stop boxing ourselves into an obviously crammed space in the name of giving the audience what they want. The most beautiful thing about art is that it should not be tamed. </p>
GIVE THE AUDIENCE WHAT THEY WANT
ByJefferson Nnadiekwe•1 play
0:00 /
0:00
|
I know you like my insights đ. Kindly consider leaving a tip.
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate contentâuse it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio contentâhigh-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover imagesâif your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps â but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time â without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments