<p> I stared blankly at my screen in utter disbelief for 5 minutes, like I just heard I broke a bottle of champagne at Quillox. The jokes write themselves in indignation, It's a sore for eyes. </p><p>These Bits and Pieces can’t be coupled by the far-sighted. Of course they can’t. These stories of code, told in the form of epic rants, are someone’s travail. But that doesn’t compute for most.</p><p>Of course its 12:29AM, and It struck me that I'm not being heard.</p><p>For the record there are no rules, only a room of cluttered ideas but perfect lighting to say it in. False advertising</p><p> I need to distract myself, easy enough except I need an idea.</p><p>…I'm little intoxicated, I'm not gonna lie. So, what? It's not even 4am and its a Friday night.</p><p>TwoCents is open. Black background, white text. Looks like a platform for thinkers. Feels like a graveyard for approval-seekers.</p><p>Microsoft Word? Closed. I don’t need formatting. I need momentum. This is shipping, not literature.</p><p>something has kicked in.. </p><p>Last i stopped in bits and pieces we were able to build an middle man that tells the database to basically add a new classroom that our users will create. What gives this middle man power, I wonder... From my observation, It's obvious the user fills a form to create a classroom, that form is coming from the frontend (the nice little input form you fill while applying for project fame). JavaScript. The backend (the judges) can’t understand it natively; it’s not psychic. So when you fill a form, we call that the body (… still your form, but in backend language its called body). And what do we do with a body? We break it down. Dissect it. Map it.</p><p><br/></p><p>That body (remember still your form) could have three fields. Or two. Depends on how many questions you force your users to answer before they can do anything useful.</p><p>For me? Just one.</p><p>Name.</p><p>Straight to the point. Saves everybody time.</p><p><br/></p><p>While we’re waiting for that request, we run a parallel function, that function tells our database to do what databases do: create and store.</p><p><br/></p><p>But not blindly.</p><p><br/></p><p>We run checks.</p><p>We verify the data.</p><p>We ask: is the user even allowed to create a classroom?</p><p><br/></p><p>Like... you’re not logged in. You’re not a user. Why the hell are you trying to create a classroom?</p><p>Imagine no auth. Chaos.</p><p><br/></p><p>Now we’ve got a middleman — an API endpoint — that links the frontend to the backend and creates a classroom. Basically, you’re putting a letter in a DHL box, and the backend knows exactly where to send it.</p><p><br/></p><p>Cool.</p><p>Now I’ve got an idea.</p><p><br/></p><p>See, it’s not the classroom that should populate the explore page where users would like to see me post a tutorial video of how to make meth</p><p>It’s the content!</p><p><br/></p><p>The person who creates the classroom should be able to post videos or writeups, that’s what we use to populate the rest of the explore page. Not empty shells.</p><p><br/></p><p>So now the real question:</p><p>Should content be its own table in the database?</p><p>Or should it belong to the classroom?</p><p>Or to the user?</p><p><br/></p><p>I’ll sleep on that.</p><p><br/></p><p>But for now, I’m obsessing over this one thing:</p><p><br/></p><p>True mastery is being able to explain even the most grotesque and mighty detail to the simplest mind.</p><p>If I can do that, I win.</p><p><br/></p><p>Not the trending tab.</p><p>Not the applause.</p><p>Not the monthly writing prize.</p><p><br/></p><p>I win the game.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments