<p><br/></p><p>I did not come into my course of study with a grand plan, a vision board, or a lifelong dream. </p><p>I came in the way most Nigerian children do...escorted.</p><p>By parents.</p><p>By expectations.</p><p>By the gentle but firm belief that “this one is good for your future.”</p><p>At the time, my head was like an <strong>empty flash drive</strong>. Clean. Blank. Waiting.</p><p>And somehow, <strong>data</strong> was being loaded into it at full speed.</p><p>Everyone around me seemed confident. </p><p>Confident that I would understand.</p><p> Confident that I would adjust. </p><p>Confident that knowledge could simply be forced into my head like copying <strong>files</strong> from one <strong>device</strong> to another. No warnings. No “are you sure?” Just press OK and move on.</p><p>I pressed <strong>OK</strong>.</p><p>At first, I was <strong>running on default settings.</strong> </p><p>I attended classes, wrote notes, nodded at explanations, and smiled politely like I understood what was happening.</p><p>But internally, nothing was <strong>connecting</strong>. It felt like I had been <strong>programmed</strong> into a life and expected to <strong>run</strong> smoothly, using a <strong>language</strong> I technically knew, yet couldn’t speak fluently.</p><p> I showed up every day, but my brain was <strong>buffering</strong>. I was pressing <strong>keys</strong> and hoping something would make sense.</p><p>Then, slowly '<strong><em>bit by bit' </em></strong>things began to change.</p><p>A bit, for those who don’t speak computer, is something small. Tiny. Almost insignificant. And that was exactly how my understanding started. </p><p>One small concept here. </p><p>One question there.</p><p> One moment of “ohhh… so that’s what that means.”</p><p>No big revelation. No cinematic breakthrough. Just small sense <strong>loading</strong> into my brain.</p><p>Those small bits began to gather. And when enough bits come together, they form something bigger, A <strong>byte</strong>. That was when I realised I wasn’t as lost as I thought. I wasn’t clueless. I was just learning gradually, in pieces, <strong>booting</strong> at my own pace.</p><p>Somewhere along the line, cybersecurity entered the conversation.</p><p>Now, I won’t lie and say I immediately fell in love. This wasn’t a fairytale. But I became curious. </p><p>Curious about how <strong>systems</strong> work, how they fail, and how people try to protect them.</p><p> Curious about how something mostly invisible could be so powerful.</p><p>It reminded me of real life.</p><p><strong>Firewalls</strong> felt like boundaries.</p><p><strong>Vulnerabilities</strong> felt like gaps we pretend don’t exist.</p><p><strong>Threats</strong> felt like problems we don’t see coming until they arrive uninvited.</p><p>Suddenly, this course stopped feeling like punishment and started feeling like a puzzle.</p><p>I began to understand that learning isn’t about forcing <strong>information</strong> into your head. You can’t <strong>download</strong> understanding overnight. </p><p>The brain doesn’t work like that. It needs time. It needs repetition. It needs patience. It needs room to <strong>debug</strong>.</p><p>And honestly? I’m still loading.</p><p>Still making mistakes. But I’m no longer pretending to understand just to fit in. I’ve stopped running on default settings. Now, at least, I know what the <strong>error</strong> <strong>messages</strong> mean.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments